首页> 外文OA文献 >Routine sirolimus eluting stent implantation for unselected in-stent restenosis: Insights from the Rapamycin Eluting Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) registry
【2h】

Routine sirolimus eluting stent implantation for unselected in-stent restenosis: Insights from the Rapamycin Eluting Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) registry

机译:常规西罗莫司洗脱支架植入治疗未选择的支架内再狭窄:雷帕霉素洗脱支架的见解由鹿特丹心脏病医院(RESEARCH)评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

textabstractObjective: To assess the effectiveness of routine sirolimus eluting stent (SES) implantation for unselected patients with in-stent restenosis and to provide preliminary information about the angiographic outcome for lesion subgroups and for different in-stent restenosis patterns. Design: Prospective, single centre registry. Setting: Tertiary referral centre. Patients: 44 consecutive patients (53 lesions) without previous brachytherapy who were treated with SES for in-stent restenosis were evaluated. Routine angiographic follow up was obtained at six months and the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events was evaluated. Results: At baseline, 42% of the lesions were focal, 21% diffuse, 26% proliferative, and 11% total occlusions. Small vessel size (reference diameter ≤ 2.5 mm) was present in 49%, long lesions (> 20 mm) in 30%, treatment of bypass grafts in 13%, and bifurcation stenting in 18%. At follow up, post-SES restenosis was observed in 14.6%. No restenosis was observed in focal lesions. For more complex lesions, restenosis rates ranged from 20-25%. At the one year follow up, the incidence of death was 0, myocardial infarction 4.7% (n = 2), and target lesion revascularisation 16.3% (n = 7). The target lesion was revascularised because of restenosis in 11.6% (n = 5). Conclusions: Routine SES implantation is highly effective for focal in-stent restenosis and appears to be a promising strategy for more complex patterns of restenosis.
机译:目的:评估常规西罗莫司洗脱支架(SES)对未选定的支架内再狭窄患者的有效性,并提供有关病变亚组和不同支架内再狭窄模式的血管造影结果的初步信息。设计:预期的单一中心注册表。地点:第三级转诊中心。患者:接受过SES支架内再狭窄治疗的连续44例患者(53个病灶),之前没有近距离放疗。在六个月时进行了常规血管造影随访,并评估了主要不良心血管事件的发生率。结果:在基线时,有42%的病灶是局灶性的,21%的弥漫性,26%的增生性和11%的总闭塞。小血管尺寸(参考直径≤2.5 mm)占49%,长病变(> 20 mm)占30%,旁路移植术占13%,分叉支架占18%。随访时,SES后再狭窄的发生率为14.6%。在局灶性病变中未观察到再狭窄。对于更复杂的病变,再狭窄率在20%至25%之间。在一年的随访中,死亡发生率为0,心肌梗死为4.7%(n = 2),靶病变血运重建率为16.3%(n = 7)。由于再狭窄,目标病灶重新血管化(11%)(n = 5)。结论:常规SES植入对于局灶性支架内再狭窄非常有效,并且对于更复杂的再狭窄模式而言似乎是一种有前途的策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号